汽車保險 (第三者及全保) 深入了解 Vehicle Insurance (Third party and Comphrensive) in depth

 (English version below)

第三者保險

對於部分車主購買 第三者保險首選都係為左平為主. 

基本上大部分既汽車保險, 除左政府要求的 "強制性" 對於第三者的死亡和受傷的法律責任最低要求的保險金額外, 通常都包括埋 第三者財產損失. 

唯一注意就係購買時既第三者財產墊底費, 會唔會只係差少少既保費, 就享受到底啲既墊底費?

不過今次再講多啲有關 "強制性" 呢樣野.

強制性 (法例要求你買個保險先可以係合法使用車輛), 基於 - 使若干條款無效及有權追回款項條款, 保險合同中的條款可能會被視為無效. 即係出左意外都一定要賠 (對於第三者的死亡和受傷). 但後面個句 "有權追回款項條款" 代表住保險公司係可以追回已支付的款項. 

乜野情況下會令到保險公司追番投保人/當時人? 除左個啲詐騙, 隱瞞重要事實外, 仲有係違反法律條款. 例如更換左唔岩裝係部車既輪胎 (特別係講緊輕型貨車), 就有機會被保險公司追討

部分輕型貨車車主都會更換呔鈴並安裝私家車輪胎, 但市面上並非所有私家車輪胎都岩裝. Hiace 200, 換左呔鈴. 但改還改, 都唔好裝條唔岩輕型貨車既輪胎吧? 望真啲睇下用緊咩呔?

215/50 R17 95W Sailun Atrezzo ZSR.

💣95承重 (承重 690kg), 你連部車既淨重量都負重唔到. 出現任何意外, 就算唔係你錯, 點都會怪罪於部車裝左不合規格輪胎. 

🙈係呢個情況下, 如果駕駛呢部車既當事人發生意外被第三者索償, 除左好大機會都一定被拒絕理賠財物, 更有機會被自己投保的保險公司追討番第三者的死亡和受傷賠償.

👀除了汽車第三者保險外, 其他強制性保險包括 船隻責任保險, 大廈法團保險及僱員補償保險都適用於 "使若干條款無效及有權追回款項條款". 

作為 Tyrehood 客戶既您睇緊呢篇文章, 唔少得本人要幫您地拎多啲優惠. 臨緊續保時間, 不妨問下保費, 盡量幫您搵最平及/或優惠價既保費俾您.

綜合保險 (全保)

新車一定買全保. 又係間間都大同小異. 除左又係墊底費之外, 當中其實值得留意既地方:

💡 無賠償折扣還原保障 (NCD Protection)

條款通常例明受保期間總額不超過某數額或汽車市值的某個%(以最底為準), 並保留您既 e.g. 60%NCD .... 係保留您既 NCD, 唔係保留您既保費. 

🙌新車賠償

通常係首次登記一年內, (有啲可能係必須 製造年份與首次登記年份相同), 係完全損毀或被盜竊後可以有一部全新車賠償.

🌁換擋風玻璃

有冇聽過一粒石仔打中您塊擋風玻璃就有機會出現好似子彈咁既撞擊. 所以從來都唔好係大車後面行駛. 但係避到行車避唔到您泊左部車係樹下跌左大樹枝落黎. 全保通常有最高賠償金額俾您去更換擋風玻璃

📂提供代用車

部車被人偷左或全損唔用得 超過某時間, 保險公司會提供代用車(支付某%租金). (設有每日及每年最高賠償). 有時對於一定要用車番工放工既人, 減底左個支出.

🚨 幫您追討墊底費

如已判左錯不在您

💵 豁免第三者財物墊底費

係某年齡層內 (加埋 X年既駕駛經驗以上). 雖然有啲墊底費都只係幾千, 但都好過冇. (雖則有啲車款全保都要過萬)

可能唔係間間都有晒以上所有野. 但未必所有野都岩您用. 當然最好用唔著. 買保險都只係為左留條後路俾自己. 就算唔係自己錯, 至少都可以保到自己.

1) P牌, 駕駛經驗 2年以下 , 25歲以下 係咪好難買?

二手車黎講應該係比較難搵到但都實會有保險公司肯俾您投保. 有時咁岩您買既個部車保費都可能唔貴.

2) 點解唔同保險公司會有唔同保費?

我都唔知點解. (講緊如果相同墊底費同保額). 但並非一定只有一間保險公司先會係最平. e.g. 保險公司 A 既 BMW 保費係最平, 但保險公司B 既 Tesla 保費係平過保險公司A.

-----------------------------------------------

Third Party Insurance

Purchasing third party insurance, for some, may opt for the cheapest one.

Vehicle insurance basically include "compulsory" third party death and injury legal liability minimum amount requirement, and third party assets loss. (which is not compulsory)

Important note on third party assets loss is the excess, which could probably just a small amount of difference in the insurance cost that could give you a lower excess.

This time, let's go into detail of "Compulsory"

Compulsory (the law require you to purchase insurance), due to ( 使若干條款無效及有權追回款項條款) clauses that render certain terms invalid and grant the right to recover payments. This implies the insurance company needs to pay the third party victim regardless of the terms in the contract. But the latter of the sentence give the insurance company the right to chase back the amount paid

Lying and not disclosing important information is definitely part of the conditions that the insurance company will chase back the amount. Violating certain law is also part of it, e.g. installing tyres that are not suitable for the vehicle (especially van), which may be part of the conditions.

Some van owners will change their rims and sizes, and install passenger vehicle tyres. However, not all passenger tyres are suitable. For this Hiace which has replaced its all four rims with unsuitable tyres. Zoom in and look what tyres it is using....

215/50 R17 95W Sailun Atrezzo ZSR.

💣With a load index of 95 (Able to support 690kg), it cannot even support your vehicle kerb weight. If any accident occurs, your tyres (which fail to meet the legal requirement) will be blamed for the cause even if it is not your fault.

🙈 In this case, insurance company most likely reject any claims on third party assets loss, and might chase after any amount it paid for the third party death and injury.

👀 ( 使若干條款無效及有權追回款項條款) clauses that render certain terms invalid and grant the right to recover payments also applied to other compulsory insurance e.g. marine third party insurance, building, Building Owners' Corporation Insurance and employee compensation insurance

As a Tyrehood customer reading this article, feel free to enquire your vehicle insurance before you renew your current one. I will try to get the lowest and/or discounted premium for you.

Comprehensive Insurance

For all new vehicles, owners will purchase comprehensive insurance which almost every insurances look similar except its excess. Look at what it covers, some of it may raise your awareness...

💡 NCD Protection

Your e.g. 60% NCD will remain even after you file and made a claim (under certain amount or %). But that's ONLY your NCD, not your premium.

🙌 New vehicle replacement

Your new vehicle registration normally must be the same as manufacture year in order to enjoy this coverage for new vehicle replacement under first year if total loss or stolen.

🌁 Windscreen replacement

A small stone could hit through your vehicle windscreen like a bullet. That's why you should never drive behind a lorry or truck. You could avoid driving behind those dangerous scenarios but the branches could drop on your vehicle whether or not you are parking at the side. Your full coverage has a maximum claim amount for you to replace your windscreen.

📂Provide vehicle rental services

Upon stolen or total loss for some time, your vehicle insurance company may help you to pay a large % of the rental (with maximum amount each day and year). This is especially good coverage to those who needs to drive for transportation

🚨 Help you to chase after your paid excess

if it has judged that it is not your fault

💵 Exemption of third party assets excess

Under a certain age period with some driving experience. Although excess may only a few thousand, but it's better than none. 

Those above mentioned may not be covered by the comprehensive insurance depending on your insurance company. Even if it may not suit you, (better not able to use it), the purchase of insurance is for a backup plan in case something happened to protect yourself.

1) Probation license, 2 driving experience below, 25 years old and below, is it difficult to purchase vehicle insurance?

If you are purchasing second hand vehicle, there are still insurance companies who offer you with a high premium.

2) Why there is different premium in different insurance companies?

No idea. (to those with the same excess). But it is not necessary true that only one insurance company is the cheapest for all. One may be cheaper for a certain vehicle model while the other is cheaper for another model.

電動車輪胎. 一定是電動車唯一選擇嗎? Electric Vehicle tyres, is the best for EV ?

 

(English version below)

電動車越出越多, 電動車(EV)輪胎都越出越多. 買左部電車番黎玩左排, 被人sell 話要買番電動車輪胎先岩用? 還是自己覺得一定要用番同款先岩用?

不如睇下您對電動車輪胎有幾了解....

🚗 電動車輪胎聲稱先岩用係電動車?

好多年前當 Tesla 係香港賣 Tesla Model S 個陣 (即當時100%免稅無上限), 所原配既輪胎係Michelin Pilot Sport 3/4 及 Pirelli Pzero. 並非 EV輪胎. 但當年既車主投拆既係輪胎損耗太快. 多年內, 好多 Tesla 車主都試過唔同牌子既普通呔, 雖然有啲牌子係比較耐用, 但最多都係用多幾個月至半年. 但直至現時電動車輪胎已經出現, Model S 車主都並非所有有意轉向 EV 呔. (岩岩最近有個客裝左黎試). 

Model 3 同 Y 出現後所原配既EV輪胎, 有啲人覺得好唔掂, 有啲人覺得冇乜野. 當年頭個班新車落地後仲即時換晒4條 普通輪胎. (最近兩年新車落地現時已經沒有呢個現象). 

所以唔存在, "電動車一定要裝電動車輪胎". 更唔存在 "一款輪胎只岩用一款車上"

🔱電動車輪胎先夠承重裝係電動車

以 255/45 R19 為例, 

EV呔

原配Hankook 承重為 104

Kumho HP71 EV 呔承重為 104

賽輪 Erange EV  呔承重為 104

普通呔

Falken FK510 承重為 104

Michelin PS4 SUV 承重為 100

普通呔有個係100 咪少左囉? 少左又係咪唔岩用? 先唔講計數 (都唔諗住係呢到講計數)

再睇下另一個尺寸, 255/40 R20 (都係裝係同一部車上)

EV呔

原配 Michelin PS EV  呔承重為 101

賽輪 Erange EV  呔承重為 101

普通呔

Falken FK520 承重為 101

唔想承重由高變底? 其實有冇咁大既需要先? 您部車又唔係van 仔.

其實香港輪胎市場雖然係細, 供應商拎貨自然唔會拎太多唔同款式番黎. 從而配合番現有香港汽車最底所需的承重.

📊電動車輪胎耐用過普通呔?

按道理上應該係耐用過普通呔. 睇番美國U.T.Q.G 標準下按理上個受磨損程度都係高過一般輪胎. 無理由整左新款出黎最後結果都係一樣吧? 特別係條呔仲要貴過同牌子既其他款. 

耐用係首選既話, 應該係揀 EV 呔.

但價錢 > 耐用既話, 就一係揀 韓國EV 呔 (e.g. Kumho, Hankook)或 賽輪, 一係揀番普通呔. 

又要想耐用要EV呔, 又要想用大牌子 米芝蓮, Yokohama, 石橋, 又要想價錢平到好似 大陸呔價錢咁, 港車北上係中國珠海裝中國製既輪胎一定岩您. 

(呢個係不爭的事實, . 當然都需要諗緊對應方法.) 

但耐用啲, 會有啲咩唔同? 以同尺寸 (255/45 R19) 睇, 

PS EV 好似真係令耗電量減底, 岩晒EV車. 

Michelin PS4 SUV , 濕地性能係 A 級, 相反

Michelin PS EV 濕地性能係 B 級. 

反而EV呔既濕地性能仲底過普通呔?

之後某啲EV車主 又會諗, 想要耐用, 又想要安全, 又想要咬地. 一定係 Michelin 唔好. 

有冇資料可以比較其他同牌子? 我搵唔到. 但肯定唔會有, 要耐用, 要靜, 要咬地, 要安全, 要濕地好, (仲要平). 

我個人認為安全係司機能夠控制的問題是並非只是輪胎. 您睇下意外發生既詳細就可以了解更多.

🌐電動車輪胎靜過普通呔?

睇番上面兩個 PS EV vs PS4 SUV, 兩者既嘈音都係B 級水平. 不過 PS EV 大部分都有配有靜音綿, 正常行駛下通常有靜音綿都係靜過 PS4 SUV, 呢個係不能夠以歐盟標籤去分出EV呔係咪同普通呔一樣靜. 但如果兩者之間都冇靜音綿的話, 就說得通兩者之間一樣聲音.

但並非所有電動車呔都配有靜音綿. 即使輪胎有標記為 T0, T1 等(以表示該輪胎專給予tesla車用), 都未必有靜音綿. 

靜音綿係電動車輪胎未出之前已經一早配係普通輪胎. 當中包括舊款的Tesla Model S 及 其中一款(?) Benz. 

(可以睇本人既實驗: https://tyrehood.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-sound-proof-tire-does-it-really.html )

❓ 邊一款呔先岩我部電動車用

又係個句: 試. 冇啦. 您個朋友話呢款呔好, 個款呔好, 但最後渣個部車都係您自己. 你朋友話 Michelin Pilot Sport 5 好咬地, 岩您. 但你其實需要既係俾到長途舒適及靜既 Michelin Primacy 4 +

買錯呔裝左好差性能咁點算? 輪胎市場永遠都係一分錢一分貨. Michelin 係貴但一定俾到足夠信心. 韓國Kumho, 或中國牌子賽輪係平, 但唔一定差. 可能您的技術根本唔需要咁高要求買貴呔.

--------------------

 

(English version below)

More varieties of Electric Vehicle coming up, more Electriv Vehicle (EV) tyre appears as well. You got a EV, and was told that only EV tyre is suitable for your vehicle? Or you believe that the same model as Originally Equipped (OE) should be the best?

Let's find out more about electric vehicle tyres....

🚗 Electric vehicle tyres is only suitable for EV?

Some years ago when Tesla sold its Tesla Model S in Hong Kong (100% tax exemption without limit), its OE is Michelin Pilot 3/4 and Pirelli Pzero, not EV tyre. Many complaints about its durability, and change to different tyre models. Some models are more durable, but none can go extra more than a year.

With EV tyres are more common now, Model S vehicle owners are still keeping their normal tyres on them. (just recently got one started to try out)

With the release of Model 3 and Y OE with EV tyres, some dislike and quickly replaced all four to normal tyres. (but these years do not see such batch of people replacing all 4 tyres when they get their v ehicles)

Hence, "EV must install EV tyres" does not hold water. so as "one tyre model only suitable for one vehicle model"

🔱 Only EV tyres can support EV

In the instance of 255/45 R19

EV tyre

Original Equipped Hankook loading index is 104

Kumho HP71 EV loading index is  104

賽輪 Erange EV  loading index is 104

Normal tyre

Falken FK510 loading index is  104

Michelin PS4 SUV loading index is  100

One of the normal tyre loading index is 100. Less than 104 does it mean it is not suitable to install? Let's look at another size which is also original equipped with the same vehicle. (No calculation will be mentioned in this article)

EV tyre

Original Equipped Michelin PS EV  loading index is 101

Sailun Erange EV loading index is 101

普通呔

Falken FK520 loading index is 101

You don't want the loading index of the tyre lower than your original equipped one? Think about it, do you really need that much loading. Your vehicle is not a van.

In fact, the Hong Kong tyre market is too small such that suppliers will not import too many varieties models, which in turn only import tyres that suits Hong Kong vehicles.

📊EV tyre is more durable than normal tyre?

Theoretically speaking it is MORE durable than normal tyres. Refer to the U.S. U.T.Q.G standard, its treadwear is higher than normal tyres. Afterall, EV tyre is more expensive than normal tyre, it should should have something special about it.

For durability, EV tyre should be the first choice.

But price > durability, that will be either made in Korea Kumho, Hankook, or Made in China Sailun , or normal tyres.

But you want durable EV tyres and still want top few brands and its price must be as low as China brand tyres. You should go China to change made in China tyres via NorthBound travel.

(This is an understatement that China market products are way cheaper than Hong Kong market, which require a better strategy to compete with them. )

With the same size 255/45 R19, 

PS EV is not just durable, but also EV efficient. very suitable for EV.

BUT.

Michelin PS4 SUV , wet performance is A, against

Michelin PS EV wet performance is B

EV tyre wet performance is lower than normal tyre?

There comes the thinking that someone will want more durable, safety, high traction. It must be Michelin is not up to your standard.

I couldn't find more information about other brands with different models comparison. However, it will not have "durable, quiet, high traction, safe and wet performance must be good." (and must be cheap.)

In addition, I believe safety is controlled by the driver rather than the tyres nowadays. Look at the accident details and you will know why.

🌐EV tyre is quieter than normal tyres?

Look at the above comparison between PS EV and PS4 SUV, both are ranked at B Db level. But most PS EV contains acoustic cotton that makes PS EV low noise than PS4 SUV. This cannot be determined by EU label. However, if both are without acuostic cotton, judging from the EU label both models should be about the same noise level.

Yet, not all EV tyres come with acoustic cotton. Even if tires are marked T0, T1 etc (which indicates it is approved for Tesla equipped) are not necessarily mean they have acoustic cotton.

Acoustic cotton appeared in the market way before the release of EV tyres. The tesla model s (those old models), and one of the models for Benz, their OE tyres are with Acoustic cotton.

(check out my DIY : https://tyrehood.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-sound-proof-tire-does-it-really.html )

❓ which model is suitable for my EV?

Still the same, "try". Your friend told you that this model is good. But you are the one who drives on the road. Your friend told you to use Michelin Pilot Sport 5 with very good traction. It suits you. But you actually need a Michelin Primacy 4+ that offers you comfort and silent in a long journey.

Afraid of purchasing the wrong model? In the tyre industry, price determines its performance. Michelin is expensive but it surely can offer you absolute confidence. Korea brand e.g. Kumho, or China brand like Sailun might have low price, but this does not mean it has bad performance. Afterall, your skill does not necessarily mean you need to purchase a top brand for your requirement.